Search for: All records

This study explores the understanding and practice of resilience among electrical utilities in the United States, focusing on how practitioners in the utility sector conceptualize and apply resilience in their work. As electricity becomes increasingly central to modern life, powering critical infrastructure and essential services, the resilience of power systems has gained prominence in energy policy and planning. However, there is a lack of standardized definitions and approaches to resilience in both academia and practice, particularly from an energy service perspective. The research employs a qualitative approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews with experts (practitioners) from transmission and distribution utilities in the United States to examine their definitions, understanding, and applications of resilience. By adopting a grounded approach, the study aims to identify key themes and concepts that practitioners associate with power system resilience. The findings outline that there is no clear definition of resilience amongst utility practitioners, and resilience and reliability are often used interchangeably/synonymously as there are no fixed indicators for resilience amongst practitioners. At present, unlike reliability, utilities are not including resilience as a term in their long-term resource planning, and neither are reporting resilience-based indicators to any of the government agencies. The findings contribute to the ongoing dialogue on energy resilience and offer a foundation for developing more comprehensive and context-specific approaches to building resilient energy systems that prioritize critical services and vulnerable populations. 

Space cooling constitutes >10% of worldwide electricity consumption and is anticipated to rise swiftly due to intensified heatwaves under emerging climate change. The escalating electricity demand for cooling services will challenge already stressed power grids, especially during peak times of demand. To address this, the adoption of demand response to adjust building energy use on the end-user side becomes increasingly important to adapt future smart buildings with rapidly growing renewable energy sources. However, existing demand response strategies predominantly explore sensible cooling energy as flexible building load while neglecting latent cooling energy, which constitutes significant portions of total energy use of buildings in humid climates. Hence, this paper aims to evaluate the demand response potential by adjusting latent cooling energy through ventilation control for typical medium commercial office buildings in four representative cities across different humid climate zones, i.e., Miami, Huston, Atlanta, and New York in the United States (US). As the first step, the sensible heat ratio, defined as sensible cooling load to total building load (involving both sensible and latent load), in different humid climates are calculated. Subsequently, the strategy to adjust building latent load through ventilation control (LLVC) is explored and implemented for demand response considering the balance of energy shifting, indoor air quality, and energy cost. Results reveal that adjusting building ventilation is capable of achieving 30%–40% Heating, Ventilation, and Air-conditioning (HVAC) cooling demand flexibility during HVAC operation while among this, the latent cooling energy contributes 56% ~ 66.4% to the overall demand flexibility. This work provides a feasible way to improve electricity grid flexibility in humid climates, emphasizing the significant role of adjusting latent cooling energy in building demand response.